Veteran smartphone reviewer Shaun McGill has been using both the HTC One X and the HTC One S over the last couple of weeks. If you’re weighing up a choice between these two handsets, this is a must read post. Here’s his comparison.
HTC One X vs HTC One S:
The HTC One S will not be getting anywhere near the same amount of attention the One X has been getting, but for me it has turned out to be a surprise package. I received both phones from Clove and put the One S to one side while I concentrated on the fantastic screen on the X. After a couple of days I turned my attention to it and was surprised at how good it felt.
It has a generous 4.3″ screen and is only 8mm deep. I cannot tell you how thin a phone this size feels, but HTC has included some clever design choices that work together to create what is a very positive experience when in the hand. The depth is perfect for a device like this and marries well to the curved edges creating a slab that feels like a perfectly crushed pebble. The metal casing is what makes the phone feel so rigid in spite of the minimal depth and this together it creates a superb form factor.
The One S is £58 cheaper then the One X and the differences are detailed below-
Screen-
One X: 4.7″ Super-LCD with 1280 x 720 pixel resolution
One S: 4.3″ Capacitive with 590 x 960 pixel resolution
Processor-
One X: 1.5GHz Quad-Core
One S: 1.5GHz Dual-Core
Storage memory-
One X: 32GB
One S: 16GB
Back camera-
One X: 8 Megapixel, 28mm Wide Angle lens with f2.0 aperture
One S: 8 Megapixel, F2.0 aperture lens
Front camera-
One X: 1.3 Megapixel
One S: VGA
Battery-
One X: 1800 mAh
One S: 1650mAh
So, for £58 extra you get a bigger screen using better technology, twice the storage space, better front and back cameras, faster processor and a bigger battery. That seems like £58 well spent to me, but is not the whole story.
The One S is still a brilliant smartphone and one that uses the hardware it has been given perfectly. The screen is still very good, but pixels are viewable from time to time and it has a defined portrait feel to it. There is still a tiny gap between the screen surface and the software, but it does not quite pop in the way the One X does.
Performance is excellent and I, again, noticed no slowdowns at all, and the camera offers performance that is a match for the iPhone 4S and other high-end phones. In short, there is very little wrong with this phone and if I had to choose between the One X and One S I personally would go for the latter.
That may not be a logical decision when I consider how many extra features and specifications I could get for little extra money, but the design and form of the One S have charmed me completely. And then I think again and wonder if I could use a phone every day knowing that there is a bigger alternative with better specifications also available. I would still choose the One S over the One X, but if all of the One X features, including the amazing screen technology, could be squeezed into the One S body then I am sold. I would be on the phone to Clove and handing over my money in an instant. As it stands, I am still seriously considering one of these for personal use, but am completely stuck exactly half-way between the two.
The One S is a stunning smartphone which stands up well on its own, but the One X is not priced at a significantly higher level to make the One S feel worth just £58 less. Both phones are brilliant, they really are, and your main problem at this time is choosing between the two. My head says the One X and my heart says the One S. You will have to decide for yourselves.
Do you realise how old the word ‘veteran’ makes me sound?:)
Lol, very much so. Maybe I should have gone for seasoned.
Peppery?
Shaun you’ve said dual core for the S as opposed to quad core for the X.
That’s true but not the whole story. A dual core Qualcomm S4 is arguably faster than a Tegra 3.
In fact the HTC One XL (same as the X but with the S4) could be faster than the X. It’s really the US version because it has LTE built-in, but apparently it’s also coming to Europe.
I think we are seeing the dual cores running faster than the quad cores, mainly because I don’t think there is any software that really takes advantage of all those cores – let us face it, there are a lot of apps etc which barely take advantage of the dual cores including android. I suspect that it is probably with the next version of Android that we are really going to start seeing the advantage or more cores.
Thanks for sharing the info about the cores guys, it’s an interesting consideration. I didn’t realise that about the XL Bug, it would be interesting if it did come to Europe.
“A dual core Qualcomm S4 is arguably faster than a Tegra 3.”
That is true, but the quad core could also be faster in some situations. I guess we could call them even in a way.