Snap or Nokia E71?


Any individual who is serious about sending email and text messages on the move, is likely to select something with a keyboard.

Just two devices possible devices that would suit are the Nokia E71 and the HTC Snap, but which one, and why?

On the surface, it seems that there is little between the two that would suggest that one is a better option than another.  However deeper analysis tells a whole different story.

Technically both devices are very similar.  Both have a QWERTY keyboard, both have a 2.4 inch QVGA display, Bluetooth, WiFi, GPS, HSDPA connectivity, a microSD card slot and a 1500mAh battery.

Slight technical differences include the Nokia E71 having a 3.15 megapixel camera whilst the HTC Snap is fitted with only a 2 megapixel. The Snap however offers up to 7.2Mbps connection speed whilst the E71 is limited to just 3.6.

So little in it, I am sure you agree. So which to choose?

There will always be an element of personal choice in any purchasing decision.  The E71 certainly looks initially more appealing, thanks to the robust metal casing. Whilst the Snap looks like it has the better and more usable keyboard.

The E71 is favoured by many.  It’s solid in every way.  The reliable operating system, good design, excellent call quality and the Nokia brand stamped on for good measure.

However what it does not offer is quite such a natural typing and input experience like the Snap.  The fractionally larger profile of the Snap gives room for larger keys which provide that ever so fractional but important improved data entry. The E71 keys are fantastic, much better thank many competing devices like the Palm Treo Pro and the Samsung i780, but when choosing a device like this, such small factors matter.

The Snap does also have the benefit of the Windows Mobile Operating System.  Arguably not the most desired platform but the most functional and appropriate when it comes to integration to your email, and access and connection to your home or office server.

The simple and sturdy process offered by Windows gives an extra appeal to those who need a serious business tool.  The interface on the Snap has been tweaked by HTC to make it a little more appealing to use, and an ‘inner circle’ button brings together emails from your most important contacts.

Graphic interfaces and technicalities aside both have what it takes and offer a sensible and affordable messaging package without the added cost and hassle often involved with RIM’s Blackberry devices.

If there has to be one winner, the Snap gains it just, thanks to the 4 line QWERTY keyboard and Windows operating system.

3 Responses to “Snap or Nokia E71?”

  1. Psh Says:

    Thanks for the interesting news. Learned a lot new to subscribe to your news. I would wait for new articles. Good luck.

  2. Robin Says:

    I was going to purchase either the E71 or Snap. This is exactly the kind of review I was looking for. The Snap’s better connection speed combined with my preference for WM OS was the deciding factor. Thanks guys.

  3. Shyamraj Says:

    Thanks a lot for the info, I was in dilemma between snap and E71. I had given weightage to HTC snap than E71 earlier. Now I made the decision stronger to go with snap

Leave a Reply